Value vs Growth Stocks: What Five Themes Reveal About Deep Falls
Value vs growth stocks through five sector themes: semiconductors fell 85.9%, uranium 93.5%. How theme cycles work and how investors size them.
When people compare value vs growth stocks, they are usually comparing two kinds of bets. Value means cheap, neglected sectors such as energy, banks and materials, which tend to win when sentiment turns. Growth means exciting, expensive sectors such as technology and innovation, which tend to win while the story holds. Both can deliver strong returns, and both can fall further than almost anything else in the market.
This article looks at both styles through investment themes: sectors or stories you can hold through a single ETF. The data shows why themes attract investors and why they demand careful sizing.
Value vs growth stocks: two kinds of themes
Many ideas investors add on top of a broad core holding are not individual companies but themes: semiconductors, artificial intelligence, energy, banks, uranium, disruptive innovation. Broadly, they fall into two groups.
Value themes
- Neglected, cheap sectors
- Examples: energy, banks, materials
- Tend to do well when sentiment turns in their favour
Growth themes
- Exciting, expensive sectors
- Examples: technology, innovation
- Tend to do well while the story holds, and can fall hard when it breaks
Neither style is safe. A value theme can stay cheap for years before sentiment turns. A growth theme can look unstoppable right up to the moment its story cracks. Either way, recovering from a mistake can take years.
Five themes: strong returns, very deep falls
The figures below cover five US-listed sector ETFs, each from its own start date to June 2026. "Return a year" is the compound annual growth rate of holding the ETF throughout. "Worst fall" is the largest peak-to-trough drawdown.
| Theme | Return a year | Worst fall |
|---|---|---|
| Semiconductors (since 2000) | 10.7% | −85.9% |
| Disruptive innovation (since 2014) | 14.2% | −80.9% |
| US energy (since 1998) | 9.0% | −71.3% |
| US financials (since 1998) | 5.8% | −82.7% |
| Uranium (since 2010) | −3.2% | −93.5% |
A few things stand out:
- Good long-run returns hid brutal interim losses. Semiconductors returned 10.7% a year but lost 85.9% along the way. Recovering from a fall that deep requires a gain of roughly 610%.
- Value themes fell too. US financials, a classic value sector, lost 82.7% in the financial crisis. Energy lost 71.3%.
- Some stories never paid off. Uranium fell 93.5% and still shows a loss of 3.2% a year over its whole history. After a 93.5% fall, $10,000 becomes $650.
The theme cycle: popularity is a warning sign
Themes move in cycles of attention. By the time a theme dominates the headlines and new funds launch every week, much of the good news is usually already in the price.
The disruptive innovation ETF in the table is the clearest example. In early 2021 it was one of the most talked-about funds in the world, and that was its peak. It then fell 81%. Investors who arrived because everyone was talking about it arrived at the worst possible moment.
Popularity tells you a theme is well known, not that it is cheap or that the story will continue. Often it is a reason for extra caution.
Why exit rules matter for themes
Themes tend to have long, deep bear markets. That is exactly the kind of market where trend following has historically helped most, as the backtested figures above suggest. A rule cannot prevent losses, but it can stop a broken position from riding all the way down.
An exit rule does not need to be technical. A written condition that defines when the story is broken works too, for example: "If the reason I own this theme no longer applies, I leave." The point is to decide in advance, while calm, rather than in the middle of a fall.
Common mistakes the lesson highlights:
- Moving core, long-term money into a theme
- Averaging down without any limit as the price keeps falling
- Holding a broken story out of hope
A theme is a bet, not a plan
The most useful idea in this topic is a sizing test that is easy to state and hard to follow: if being wrong about this theme would change your life, the position is too big.
Investors who use themes often keep them small, inside a satellite part of the portfolio separate from their core holdings, and spread them across several themes rather than one. That way a single 80% or 90% fall hurts, but does not derail long-term plans.
What to do with this
- Look up the worst historical fall of any theme or sector ETF you hold or are considering. Ask whether you could sit through it at your current position size.
- Run the sizing test. If being wrong would change your life, the position is too big.
- Write down an exit condition for each theme before you need it.
- Check how many themes you hold. One theme concentrates the risk of one story breaking.
- Treat headlines with caution. If a theme is everywhere, note how much good news may already be priced in.
This article is based on Lesson 8.2 of our course Mastering Investments, where Module 1 is free.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between value and growth stocks?
Value stocks sit in neglected, cheap sectors such as energy, banks and materials. They tend to do well when sentiment turns in their favour. Growth stocks sit in exciting, expensive sectors such as technology and innovation. They tend to do well while the story behind them holds and can fall sharply when it breaks. Both styles can work, and both can take years to recover from a mistake.
Are thematic ETFs riskier than the broad market?
They can be much more volatile. In the data covered here, a semiconductor ETF fell 85.9% at its worst, a disruptive innovation ETF fell 80.9%, US financials fell 82.7% and a uranium ETF fell 93.5%. A single theme concentrates money in one story or sector, so when that story breaks there is little else in the position to cushion the fall.
How much of a portfolio can go into a single theme?
There is no single correct figure, because it depends on each investor's situation. A useful test is this: if being wrong about the theme would change your life, the position is too big. Many investors keep themes as small positions in a satellite part of the portfolio, spread across several themes, and keep their core long-term money out of them.
Turn this into a process: the numbers, live, for free
- Strategy vs buy & hold for the S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, gold, oil, Bitcoin and Nvidia — return, Sharpe ratio, worst fall
- Hedge Health: are bonds protecting stocks right now?
- Drawdowns, correlations, momentum and the glossary for every term
Go deeper: in-depth guides
What max drawdown means, how to calculate it, the S&P 500's biggest drawdowns and recovery times, and why it is a better measure of risk than volatil…
QQQ vs SPY: Nasdaq-100 vs S&P 500 returns, risk and worst fallsQQQ vs SPY compared: average returns over 1 to 25 years, every calendar year since 2000, the worst falls, volatility, fees, and why the starting poin…
Bear market vs bull market: what every US bear market since 1973 tells youBear vs bull market explained with data: every 20%+ fall in the S&P 500 since 1973, how long it lasted and how long the recovery took. Plus: are we i…
Daily, monthly or yearly compounding, with monthly contributions.
Investment calculator with dividend reinvestmentReinvested vs paid out, plus the real S&P 500 history.
Portfolio Crash TestHow your mix would have held up in every big crash since 1972.
Educational research, not investment advice. Disclaimer.