Founding Member pricing: 40% off for life. Limited to 100 founding members. See plans →

Time is your edge

Over one year, stocks are a gamble. Over 15 years, they have never lost money in our data. Why your time horizon changes everything.

The shorter your horizon, the more investing looks like gambling. The longer it is, the more it looks like a business.

S&P 500: worst, typical and best return per year by holding period
S&P 500, buy & hold, return per year over every rolling holding period since 1993

How to read the chart

For every possible start month since 1993, we measured the return per year over the next 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years:

  • Over 1 year, the result ranged from a loss of more than 40% to a gain of more than 50%. Pure noise.
  • Over 10 years, the range narrows sharply — though the worst decade, starting in 2000, still lost a little over 3% a year.
  • Over 15 and 20 years, every single period made money — the worst still gained around 4% a year.

The typical outcome stays around 8–14% a year whatever the horizon. What changes is the range around it.

What this means

  • Money you need within a few years does not belong in stocks.
  • Long-term money can afford volatility — if you can actually hold through it.
  • Judge a strategy over years, not months. Every strategy has bad years; a few months tell you nothing.
Professional investors are not smarter about the next month. They are willing to wait longer.

Related: realistic returns

Put it into practice: a free account unlocks equity curves and signals for six core markets and the full glossary.

🔒 Open free account

Educational content, not investment advice. Disclaimer.